hostmye.blogg.se

Ecu flash vs power commander
Ecu flash vs power commander




ecu flash vs power commander ecu flash vs power commander
  1. #ECU FLASH VS POWER COMMANDER FULL#
  2. #ECU FLASH VS POWER COMMANDER MODS#

PS: over 60000km and still sweet as a nut. I'll eventually get it dyno'd but i'd like to get it running reasonably well for city riding as it's my only transport. Here in france it's rare to find a tuner, the bikes are limited to under 106HP (usually )

#ECU FLASH VS POWER COMMANDER FULL#

runs really good now just the full exhaust needs a bit tuning in with a PC3 or flashing the ECU. The dirt is an accumulation of 8 years of biking, i guess it was never inspected yet alone cleaned. It wont be as new but will get alot of the crap out already, then i give it a good blast with compressed air., be careful as theres an O ring between the screen and the filter unit.

#ECU FLASH VS POWER COMMANDER MODS#

Ivan's ECU programming All mods the same (full yosh, a/b mod, BMC filter PC5 w/mapping) No FCE, Same day. Then you have the main filter, what i did it turn it around and flushed it in the opposite way to the flow, it's an old trick i used to do on field bikes. Old ECU flash w/power commander (now obsolete) Stock ECU Vs. I would reccomend buying the complete Ivans kit as it would seem that they have done their homework. Most bikes today are phenomenally technical and their computers have a ton of ability to be mo. A ECU (re)flash involves changing the onboard programming to increase fuel, change timing, etc.

ecu flash vs power commander

Also seems my numbers are allmost identical to what Ivans says. Answer (1 of 4): They are a similar concept, just the Power Commander is an additional layer of hardware. Once the pump is out you have a screen in the bottom of the feed, thats where it was gunked up. The power commander MAP is the way to go. This is a lengthy process due to using read only data, by contrast a Power commander runs live data, meaning an adjustment can be made while the bike is running and the results instantly measured giving a much quicker way of completing the fuelling process.Ī Power commander on it’s own can only do one function that being the fuelling however it does this very very well, gaining a better result easier than ECU mapping, but is unable to change other features and therefore restricts the overall gain.įor the best results possible an ECU base flash alongside a PCV is always the best option getting the best of both worlds.Īnnex 1: With multi function maps as standard these are always best optimised through the ECU as a Power Commander acts as a mask and will not adjust when different modes are selected causing potential fuelling problems.The fuel pump is quite easy to remove, just the bolts at the bottom (6 or 8 i cant remember). Maps designed for other vehicles may have similar parts I.E exhaust, air filter however the fine details in construction of the bikes, how the air box is fitted the build tolerances and even how the headers are fitted change the characteristics of air flow and the demands of fuelling/ignition.ĮCU mapping on standard equipment is done in a way which involves taking lots of recorded data then pulling out the information from the bike, editing tables in accordance with the given data and our reference points then sending this information back to the ECU for another round of testing and further adjustment. Only a full custom map covers fuelling, a quick flash with any map is irrelevant unless it has been tailored specifically to your bike that means running the bike on a rolling road as is in the configuration to be ran therefore differing exhaust configurations require different mapping tables (we always offer baffle in/out maps along with wet maps). Most commonly asked question for a tuner, “do i need a power commander if I get an ECU flash?” Let the Brocks Performance in-house team flash your stock Suzuki GSX-R1000 ECM (Engine Control Module) to our exacting specifications.






Ecu flash vs power commander